Legal Opinion

Baaken v. Naufft & Bergstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1930No. 27,550PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission denying relator compensation for accidental injuries.

In 1927, when relator lost his hand, he was in the employ of Naufft & Bergstrom, contractors who were erecting a hospital for a railroad at Proctor, Minnesota. The circumstances of his injury were these:

*273On July 4 of that year the American Legion post of the village staged a fireworks display, and in the forenoon some men arrived to put it up near the hospital. They applied to relator, who had been directed by his employers to' go to the hospital and wet down or sprinkle the cement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Second National Bank v. DonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Ramczik v. Winona MacHine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baaken v. Naufft & BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API