Legal Opinion
Hayer v. National Bank of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1980No. 4709PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHEWS, Justice.
In this appeal, in which appellee did not appear, James and Estelle Hayer attack the trial court’s failure to award them costs, attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest. We conclude that they were entitled to these items and remand for an adjustment of the trial court’s award.
In May of 1977 the Hayers entered into a consumer credit agreement with the National Bank of Alaska. The bank lent the Hayers $2,300.00 for home improvements, which the Hayers agreed to repay over a three year period, in addition to interest and other charges. They subsequently defaulted and in June,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Siegfried Wachtel and Wife, Roberta S. Wachtel v. Bryce West and Wife, Frances WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Blumenshine v. BaptisteAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Weber v. LangholzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Still v. CunninghamAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.