Pentaflex, Inc. v. Express Services, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Pentaflex, Inc., appeals from a summary judgment rendered against it on its complaint for a declaratory judgment. Pentaflex contends that the trial court erred by rendering summary judgment in favor of the defendants, by failing to rule on its motion to amend its complaint, and by failing to determine whether insurance obtained by the defendants provided it with coverage for an employer intentional tort.
We conclude that the trial court did not err by rendering summary judgment. We also conclude that the trial court did not err by failing to make a determination…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kendall v. U.S. Dismantling Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shepard Grain Co. v. CreagerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lubrizol Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Scaccia v. Fid. Invests.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Farthing v. ForsheyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Farthing v. ForsheyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024