State v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Kirk Matthews, No. 15, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. EXPERT WITNESSES – ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY – MARYLAND RULES 5-702 AND 5-403 – REVIEW FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony of the State’s photogrammetry expert witness. At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert testimony, the expert opined that a person shown carrying a shotgun in an image captured by a video camera was approximately 5’8” plus or minus two-thirds of an inch. The expert…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Katz, Abosch, etc., P.A. v. Parkway NeuroscienceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Harvin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.