Legal Opinion

Abruquah v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 2023No. 10/22PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kobina Ebo Abruquah v. State of Maryland, No. 10, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Fader, C.J. EVIDENCE – EXPERT EVIDENCE Firearms identification examiner testifying as an expert witness should not have been permitted to offer an unqualified opinion that crime scene bullets and a bullet fragment were fired from the petitioner’s gun. The reports, studies, and testimony presented to the circuit court demonstrate that the firearms identification methodology employed by the examiner in this case can support reliable conclusions that patterns and markings on bullets are consistent or inconsistent…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Katz, Abosch, etc., P.A. v. Parkway NeuroscienceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Akers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Harvin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API