Legal Opinion
Katz, Abosch, etc., P.A. v. Parkway Neuroscience
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 30, 2023No. 30/22PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Katz, Abosch, Windesheim, Gershman & Freedman, P.A., et al. v. Parkway Neuroscience and Spine Institute, LLC, No. 30, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Biran, J. EXPERT WITNESSES – ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY – MARYLAND RULE 5-702 – LIMITED REMAND – Respondent filed a lawsuit against Petitioners alleging accountant malpractice and related claims. In the course of discovery, Respondent designated an expert to provide an opinion concerning Respondent’s lost profits resulting from Petitioners’ alleged torts. Petitioners moved to exclude the testimony of the proffered expert under Daubert v.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Ingersoll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Muldrow v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023