Legal Opinion
United States v. Mottolo
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 15, 1985No. Civ. 83-547-D, 84-90-DPublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
These are actions by the United States of America against defendants Richard Motto-lo (“Mottolo”), K.J. Quinn and Co., Inc. (“Quinn”), Lewis Chemical Corporation (“Lewis”), Carl Sutera (“Sutera”), and Service Pumping and Drain Company, Inc. (“Service”), and by the State of New Hampshire against defendants Mottolo, Quinn, Lewis, and Sutera under section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), seeking to recover costs incurred in the cleanup of an allegedly hazardous waste site located…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.