Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosga

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 21, 2012No. Criminal No. 3:10CR170-HEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on two sets of petitions by non-defendant third parties to amend numerous forfeiture orders previously entered in this case, as well as motions by the United' States to strike those petitions. For the reasons set forth herein, the third-party petitions will be denied, and the Government’s motions will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Underlying Orders of Forfeiture

On June 10, 2010, the Grand Jury returned an Indictment charging twenty-seven members and affiliates of the American Outlaws Association (“AOA”) and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Marvin P. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HaileyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. United States v. Mongol NationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  3. Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  4. United States v. BowserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Joshua N. BowserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API