Legal Opinion

United States v. Hailey

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 20, 2013No. Criminal No. WDQ-11-0540PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.

Rodney Hailey (“Mr. Hailey”) was convicted of wire fraud, money laundering, and Clean Air Act violations, and the Court has ordered preliminary forfeiture. Mr. Hailey’s wife, Tracey Oliver Hailey (“Mrs. Hailey”), claims an interest in some of the forfeited property. Pending are the government’s motions to compel compliance with discovery under 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), to dismiss Mrs. Hailey’s claims, and to require compliance with 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(3) and for permission to conduct discovery. For the following reasons, the motions to compel…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Billie J. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ceballos-LepeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013
  2. United States v. PrestonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. United States v. PrestonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API