Legal Opinion
United States v. Mongol Nation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 28, 2019No. Case No. CR 13-0106-DOC-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Government's Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture Against Defendant Mongol Nation ("Mot. for POF") (Dkt. 354) and the Mongol Nation's post-trial motions. The Court heard oral arguments on February 28, 2019.
On December 13, 2018, the jury returned a verdict finding the Defendant Mongol Nation, an unincorporated association, guilty of (1) substantive RICO;1 and (2) RICO conspiracy. See Dkt. 320. The guilty verdict triggered the forfeiture phase of trial. On January 11, 2019, the jury returned a Special Verdict finding…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Mongol NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Inland Technology Incorporated v. The Allen Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Raya v. BarkaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025