People v. Mosley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1048Opinion
BAXTER, J.*
We confront a single, narrow issue. Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [147 L.Ed.2d 435, 120 S.Ct. 2348] (Apprendi) held that the Sixth Amendment generally requires a jury to find “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum.” (530 U.S. at p. 490, italics added.) If a judge makes the findings underlying his or her discretionary order that a convicted criminal defendant must register as a sex offender, is the order invalid under Apprendi insofar as it includes registered sex offender residency restrictions imposed by…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In re E.J.California Supreme Court · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- People v. AguayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena TrujilloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.