Legal Opinion

People v. Mosley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2015No. S187965PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1048Opinion

BAXTER, J.*

We confront a single, narrow issue. Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [147 L.Ed.2d 435, 120 S.Ct. 2348] (Apprendi) held that the Sixth Amendment generally requires a jury to find “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum.” (530 U.S. at p. 490, italics added.) If a judge makes the findings underlying his or her discretionary order that a convicted criminal defendant must register as a sex offender, is the order invalid under Apprendi insofar as it includes registered sex offender residency restrictions imposed by…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In re E.J.California Supreme Court · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. AguayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena TrujilloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API