Legal Opinion

In re E.J.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2010No. S156933; No. S157631; No. S157633; No. S157634PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

On November 7, 2006, the voters enacted Proposition 83, The Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law (Prop. 83, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2006); hereafter Proposition 83 or Jessica’s Law). Proposition 83 was a wide-ranging initiative intended to “help Californians better protect themselves, their children, and their communities” (id., § 2, subd. (f)) from problems posed by sex offenders by “strengthening] and improving] the laws that punish and control sexual offenders” (id., § 31).

Among other revisions to the Penal Code,1 Proposition 83…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In re TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re EJCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API