Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 13, 1990No. 09-89-002 CR, 09-89-003 CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted, in a consolidated trial, of the offenses of possession of the controlled substances phenylacetone in an amount in excess of 400 grams and methamphetamine in an amount less than 28 grams. The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $100,000 fine and twenty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $10,000 fine, respectively. Appellant perfected this appeal urging five identical points of error in each case. We will address them chronologically rather than…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. OliverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ivatury v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. Carrion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Wiese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API