State v. Oliver
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
OVERSTREET, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of possessing more than 400 grams of phenyl-acetone and less than 28 grams of methamphetamine. The jury assessed punishment at, respectively, ninety-nine years imprisonment and a $100,000.00 fine, and twenty years confinement and a $10,000.00 fine. 1 These convictions were reversed. Oliver v. State, 787 S.W.2d 170 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1990).
The State’s petitions were granted on two grounds: to determine whether indictments returned after the effective date of Article 1.14(b), V.A.C.C.P., 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Teal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.