Legal Opinion

Ivatury v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 6, 1990No. 05-89-00564-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Chandrasekhar Ivatury appeals his conviction of criminal solicitation of capital murder. After a jury found him guilty, it assessed punishment at twenty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections 1 and a $10,000 fine. Ivatury argues: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) that the State did not disprove Ivatury’s theory of entrapment; (3) that the State committed Batson error during jury selection; and (4) that the trial court erred when it allowed evidence of extraneous offenses and when it denied his motion to suppress…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Bausley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  4. Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  5. Roberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API