San Diego Flume Co. v. Chase
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action was brought for the purpose of having a contract for the sale of a water right for irrigation purposes reformed, and that it be declared that the amount of water “ conveyed to and owned by the defendant be limited by said contract to two and one quarter inches of water, miners’ measure, under a four-*562inch pressure, and no more, and that he be entitled and required to take the same in accordance with such reasonable rules and regulations as may be established from time to time by plaintiff,” and for such other equitable relief in the premises as should be proper.
The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- San Diego Flume Co. v. SoutherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Grosse v. BarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- San Diego Flume Co. v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893