Grosse v. Barman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Herbert J. Goudge, Williams, Goudge & Chandler, and Harry L. Bearing, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff as assignee of the Abbot Kinney Company, a corporation, to recover the sum of twelve and a half per cent upon the net income and profits derived from certain demised premises during the half year ending December 31, 1906, alleged to be due to plaintiff as such assignee under and by virtue of a certain agreement, dated the fourth day of March, 1905, and made and entered into between said defendants and plaintiff’s assignor.
Among other things, it appears from said agreement that the Abbot Kinney Company did, on December 1, 1902, make a lease of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- San Diego Flume Co. v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Gluck v. Commercial Merchants Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1949