Legal Opinion

San Diego Flume Co. v. Souther

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1898No. 419PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

C. H. Souther and W. S. Crosby brought this suit against the San Diego Plume Company to cancel a written contract. It was alleged in the bill that the San Diego Plume Company, a corporation engaged in the business of furnishing water for irrigation and other purposes, made two certain contracts with the complainants, to furnish them water for the irrigation of their lands in San Diego county, Cal.; that by each of said contracts the flume company was to furnish 15 inches of water, continuous flow, measured- under four-inch pressure; that the first contract was entered…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Seymour Water Co. v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. Laramie Rivers Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fenton v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Jackson v. Indian Creek Reservoir Ditch & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API