San Diego Flume Co. v. Chase
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County; George Puterbaugh, Judge. Action by the San Diego Flume Company against Levi Chase for the reformation of a contract. From the judgment, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment, with a bill of exceptions, and is the second appeal in the case: See 87 Cal. 561, 25 Pac. 756, and 26 Pac. 825. The nature of the case, and most of the facts necessary for understanding it, are there stated. As stated, the action was brought to have a contract reformed to accord with the alleged intention of the parties, which, it was averred, was to sell two and one-quarter inches of water, miners’ measure, under a four-inch pressure, whereas, by the fraud of defendant, the contract was so drawn as to entitle defendant to all the water which…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- San Diego Flume Co. v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re BirdUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017