Legal Opinion
Hertz v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided April 6, 2001No. A-7585PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
The Department of Corrections sent Sidney R. Hertz to a privately operated prison facility in Arizona to serve his sentence for second-degree murder. Hertz objected to this move and filed a superior court action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and for monetary damages "with a writ of habeas corpus incorporated" against the Department of Corrections and several state officials (DOC). The superior court granted DOC's motion for summary disposition of Hertz's claim for habeas corpus and, pursuant to Civil Rule 54(b), entered a final judgment on…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rathke v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Harvey v. AntrimCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- Ellison v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024