Legal Opinion
ROGERS POTATO SERVICE v. Countrywide Potato
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 2004No. 74860-8PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
97 P.3d 745 (2004)
152 Wash.2d 387
ROGERS POTATO SERVICE, L.L.C., Petitioner,
v.
COUNTRYWIDE POTATO, L.L.C.; Ray Corey and Jane Doe Corey, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 74860-8.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
September 16, 2004.
John Graham Schultz, George Fearing, Leavy Schultz Davis & Fearing PS, Kennewick, for Petitioner.
Lewis William Card, Wenatchee, for Respondents.
2Per curiam
We consider here whether the evidence adduced at trial supports the judgment in this action for breach of contract and breach of warranties. Because circumstantial evidence is as acceptable as direct evidence, we conclude…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Reese v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Rogers Potato Service, L.L.C. v. Countrywide Potato, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- Disciplinary Proceeding Against KronenbergWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KronenbergWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. O'NEALWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. O'NealWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. EasterlinWashington Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.