Legal Opinion

State v. Easterlin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. 76861-7PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — “Armed criminals pose an increasing and major threat to public safety and can turn any crime into serious injury or death.” “Hard Time for Armed Crime Act.” Laws of 1995, ch. 129, § l(l)(a) (Initiative 159). Reducing armed crime is a laudable goal.

Chambers, J.

¶2 But neither the initiative nor the legislature has defined “armed,” and this seemingly simple question of *206whether a defendant was in fact armed, and more importantly how to determine whether a defendant was armed, has come before us time and time again. It presents a particularly difficult question when the defendant had only…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. ValdobinosWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. O'NealWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. AbuanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API