Legal Opinion

Leelanau Transit Co. v. Houdek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The Traverse City, Leelanau & Manistee Railroad Company owned a railroad less than 25 miles long, running from Hatch’s crossing in Grand Traverse county to Northport in Leelanau county. It was not a paying proposition and its abandonment was •contemplated. In the spring of 1919 the merchants and farmers served by it conceived the organization of a new company to take it over. Plaintiff was organized as such company. Before the organization of the corporation was completed those interested solicited subscriptions for the stock. Each defendant signed a subscription for the stock and at the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Potato Growers Association v. GreinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rare Earth, Inc. v. HoorelbekeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  3. Bil-Gel Company v. ThomaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API