Legal Opinion

Bil-Gel Company v. Thoma

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 29, Calendar 46,616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Plaintiff in this case seeks the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale and purchase of corporate stock. During the summer of 1953, and, inferentially, for some time prior thereto, defendant Highland Merchandising Company was engaged in the business of selling merchandise at retail from door to door, making collections in like manner. The individual defendants were the stockholders of said corporation. Certain persons desired to purchase the stock on behalf of a corporation to be formed for the purpose of carrying on the business, and entered into negotiations with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Matthew's Evangelical Lutheran Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Harmon v. MuirheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Leelanau Transit Co. v. HoudekMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In Re Montreuil's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Linden v. HoshalMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Covey v. Covey's Little America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pim, Inc. v. Steinbichler Optical Tech. USA, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sunstone at Colorado Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. WhiteColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Garrett v. Mercedes-Benz Fin. Servs. USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  5. Realty Center New Homes Division, LLC v. Dowlen Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API