Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of Equalization
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action to recover license fees paid under protest. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury on an agreed statement of facts supplementing admissions contained in the pleadings. The action involves the validity of Chapter 199, "Laws of 1937.
The agre.ed statement of facts contains this provision: “The defendants tender and offer the following facts which are admitted by the plaintiff, but without admitting the competency, relevancy and materiality thereof; it being expressly stipulated and agreed that plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- State Ex Rel. Dufresne v. LeslieMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- State ex rel. Woods v. TookerMontana Supreme Court · 1894
- State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. BrannonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Putnam v. PutnamMontana Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Great Falls Tribune v. District Court of Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Keller v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.