Legal Opinion

Great Falls Tribune v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1980No. 79-093PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Has Well

The question before this Court is whether the District Court’s order closing to the press and public the individual voir dire examination of prospective jurors in a criminal case should be affirmed under the circumstances of this case. Our order of January 18, 1980, vacated the closure and directed the press and public be permitted to attend the voir dire examination with a written opinion to follow. This opinion constitutes the reasons for our decision.

Gene Andrew Austad was charged with two counts of deliberate homicide, robbery, sexual intercourse without consent, and aggravated burglary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. BrooklierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. AustadMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BashorMontana Supreme Court · 1980

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API