Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Brannon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1929No. 6,587PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

While the controversy arose chiefly over the question whether the salary of the assistant state chemist should be paid from the college funds or from the gasoline inspection fund, the argument has taken a wide range, and the theories of the respondents are not altogether consistent. One argument is based upon the willingness of the state chemist to have the work done under his supervision, and the assent of the other respondents to its being done in that fashion, provided all the expenses of doing it are paid for out of the gasoline fund. Another challenges the right of the legislature to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Logan v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Rowe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mills v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Great Northern Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Steen v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API