Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 1996-1421Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 255.] THE STATE EX REL. OOTEN, APPELLANT, v. SIEGEL INTERIOR SPECIALISTS COMPANY; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.,

1998-Ohio-534.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in denying wage-loss compensation, when. (No. 96-1421—Submitted December 2, 1998—Decided December 30, 1998.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD05-607. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant-claimant, Michael D. Ooten,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Wal-Mart v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API