Legal Opinion
Wal-Mart v. Ball
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1989No. 88-1477PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Judge.
The issue presented in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether the deputy commissioner (dc) erred in awarding the claimant wage loss benefits from January 1986 through December of 1987. We concur in the position urged by appellant and therefore reverse.
Claimant, a salesclerk for Wal-Mart, suffered a compensable injury on September 25, 1984, when a battery fell from a dolly and injured her foot. She visited a walk-in medical clinic where x-rays were taken. No fractures were noted and she was diagnosed as having suffered a soft tissue injury. Subsequently, she was treated by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stahl v. Southeastern X-RayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PerriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Superior Pontiac v. HearnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Glades Correctional Inst. v. BukowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Brosnan v. Sourbeck Roofing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998