Legal Opinion

State v. Stoneman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. CC 90-12-5153-C; CA A70085; SC S42085PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*539GILLETTE, J.

In 1985, the legislature enacted a criminal statute directed at the producers, purveyors, and purchasers of visual reproductions of children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. In 1990, defendant was charged with violating one section of that statute, codified at ORS 163.680 (1987), by purchasing a magazine and a video that allegedly contained portrayals of the proscribed type. At that time, ORS 163.680 provided:

“(1) It is unlawful for any person to pay or give anything of value to observe sexually explicit conduct by a child known by the person to be under 18 years of age, or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ChakerianOregon Supreme Court · 1997

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API