Legal Opinion
In re Kanter
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
These are motions on the part of the petioning creditors and the receiver in bankruptcy respectively to punish the bankrupts for contempt in failing to obey the usual order of the court requiring them to file schedules and to compel them to turn over to the receiver all their books of account, records, papers, &c., kept in-their business.
The creditors’ petition was filed on the 4th day of March, 1902, and the adjudication -was made on the 20th day of May, 1902, after a contest on the part of the bankrupts. The latter now seek to defeat the motions upon the plea that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In re FeldsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- In re Franklin SyndicateDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1900
- In re WalshDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- In Re CrabtreeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
- Czarlinsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. FratelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.