Legal Opinion
United States v. Fratello
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1968No. Nos. 66 Cr. 356, 66 Cr. 355PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
The defendants have moved, pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an order directing documentary disclosure by the government.
The government has cross-moved pursuant to Rule 16(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for an order conditioning its disclosure on disclosure by defendants of those documents which defendants intend to offer at the trial.
On the argument of the motions each side stipulated that the requirements of Rules 16(b) and 16(c) with respect to-the materiality and reasonableness of the demanded disclosures…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. Tommie Louis Brown, United States of America v. Virgil David Swain, United States of America v. Robert Lee NoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Scott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Ronald Anthony MilanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.