Legal Opinion

Randall v. Northern Milk Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 1994No. C8-94-578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge

Appellant Northern Milk Products, Inc. terminated Darrell Randall’s employment after receiving notice that he intended to claim a work-related injury. The employee brought an action against the employer for retaliatory discharge under the Workers’ Compensation Act. Minn.Stat. § 176.82 (1992). The trial court entered judgment in favor of the employee. The employer challenges the trial court’s findings and conclusion that the employer terminated the employee in retaliation for seeking workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

Darrell Randall initially began employment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Breitenfeldt v. Long Prairie Packing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  2. Hanson v. Mental Health Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. Tomlinson v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  4. Otto v. City of VictoriaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  5. Reierson v. City of HibbingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API