Legal Opinion
Otto v. City of Victoria
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 18, 2011No. Civil No. 10-559 (DSD/SER)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the motion for summary judgment by defendant City of Victoria (the City). Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
This employment dispute arises out of the termination of plaintiff Leland Marvin Otto on February 27, 2009. Otto began work for the City as an assistant laborer in the Department of Public Works in 1985. At all times relevant to this action, Otto was classified as a Public Works Worker 2. A Public Works Worker 2 performs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vinh v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020