Legal Opinion

Reierson v. City of Hibbing

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2001No. C8-00-1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Relator Byrdie Reierson seeks review of the Hibbing City Council’s decision to terminate her employment. Relator contends that (1) the decision to terminate her employment was unfair and lacked due process because the city improperly relied on hearsay and other vague comments to support its decision; (2) there was insufficient evidence in the record to support its decision; (3) she was not given the documents that she was entitled to under the Data Practices Act; and (4) the city council did not make written findings. We affirm.

FACTS

In October 1993, the City of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Randall v. Northern Milk Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Senior v. City of EdinaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of St. Cloud v. Elissa Winters, Relator.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API