Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1924No. 8 Div. 568PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The submission is on motion and on merits.

At the time of filing the transcript, motion or petition in the nature of the common-law writ of error coram nobis, or coram vobis, was also filed. Authority for the petition is urged under provisions of section 140 of the Constitution. That section of the organic law is without application to the procedure sought by the motion. The writ of coram nobis, or coram vobis, as it is sometimes indiscriminately called, was recognized to be of force in this jurisdiction, in Holford v. Alexander, 12 Ala. 280, 46 Am. Dec. 253. It was there held the writ can be…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Aiken v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Johnston v. White-SpunnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Rollan v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API