Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Adkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1925No. 18943. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff bank seeks recovery from the defendants Adkins and wife and Collins upon two wholly unpaid negotiable promissory notes, one for the principal sum of $4,950 and interest, in terms payable to the bank, purporting to have been executed and delivered to it by Adkins on February 23, 1922; -and one for the principal sum of $2,447 and interest, in terms payable to Alfred C. Amon, executor, purporting to have been executed and delivered to him by Adkins on the same day and thereafter, as it is claimed, duly assigned to the bank. The bank also seeks foreclosure of a chattel mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Frazey v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Seattle Shoe Co. v. PackardWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamb v. General Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Yuan v. ChowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. J. A. Anderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rushing v. SaboeOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. J. A. Anderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API