Legal Opinion

Frazey v. Casey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1917No. 13885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered November 22, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— This is an action at law upon a promissory note. The plaintiff had judgment below against each of the defendants. The defendant Casey has appealed.

The facts are as follows: On March 13, 1911, the defendants Louis Gilbert and Catherine Gilbert, his wife, executed and delivered their promissory note to respondent for $850, with interest at eight per cent. On the same date, a mortgage upon Tract 20, Rainier Beach Garden Tracts, in King county, was given by Gilbert and wife to secure the payment of the note to respondent Frazey. . Thereafter, on June 20, 1913, Gilbert and wife sold the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Solicitors' Loan & Trust Co. v. RobinsWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Security State Bank v. AdkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. J. A. Anderson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bank of California v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API