Legal Opinion

Seattle Shoe Co. v. Packard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1906No. 6094PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J.; entered January 6, 1905, upon granting a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case, in an action against the drawee of a draft.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

The Seattle Shoe Company was engaged in the retail boot and shoe business in the city of Seattle. The defendants are wholesale boot and shoe manufacturers in Brockton, Massachusetts. George B. Smith was a traveling representative of defendants, Seattle being a part of his territory. Smith represented the defendants from 1895 until 1904. In the spring of 1898 Smith sold the Seattle Shoe Company, through Mr. Hicks, one of the company, a bill of goods. At that time the plaintiff, the shoe company, cashed a draft which Smith had drawn on his employers Packard & Pield. During the years that…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Brown v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Lee v. Peoples Cooperative Sales Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Ballen Friedman v. Bank of KremlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. First Nat. Bank of Mathis v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API