Legal Opinion
McKnight v. Metal Volatilization Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 1904No. 41PublishedCited by 12 opinions
In Equity. Suit to compel- issuance of patent. On plea to jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
Before the 3d day of April, 1893, Upon which date Act Feb. 9, 1893, c. 74, 27 Stat. 434/2 Supp. Rev. St. 78, creating a Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, took effect, the practice concerning appeals in the Patent Office was. regulated by sections 4909 to 4914, inclusive, of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3390-3392]. These sections are as follows:
“Sec. 4909. Every applicant for a patent or for the reissue of a patent, any of the claims of which have been twice rejected, and every party to an interference, may appeal from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Butler v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
- Bernardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- Smith v. MullerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Larson v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Clements v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1923
- McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. Charles H. Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.