Legal Opinion
Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 7, 1923No. 458PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
The issue in an interference declared by the Patent Office between claim 19 of patent No. 946,442, issued to Fldridge R. Johnson, assignor to Victor Talking Machine Company, and claim No. 30 of application No. 411,454, filed by John Bailey Browning,_ was decided by the Court of . Appeals of the District of Columbia in favor of Browning. 50 App. D. C. 335, 271 Fed. 1017. Thereafter patent No. 1,402,738, containing, as claim 1, the claim in interference, was issued to Browning, assignor by mesne assignments of Bl/ioo to the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company. Thereupon the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. DuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Frasch v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Nicholas L. Etten and Chamberlain Corporation v. Lovell Manufacturing Company and Walter L. Kauffman, 2dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Harper v. ZimmermannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.