Hartman v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
Plaintiff, Laurence C. Hartman, appeals the summary judgment entered, based on the bar of the statute of limitations, in favor of defendants, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter), and Norwest Bank — Colorado Springs, N.A., a/k/a United Bank of Colorado Springs, N.A. (Norwest). Dean Witter cross-appeals the trial court’s order denying its request for attorney fees. We conclude that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to Hartman’s claims and, therefore, reverse the summary judgment in favor of Dean Witter and Norwest. We affirm the order denying attorney fees…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Strader v. Beneficial Finance Company of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Klamm Shell v. BergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996