Ex parte Mount
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.
The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by the captain of police of the city of Oakland, and the officer, in his return to the writ of habeas corpus served on him, shows that he detains the petitioner under a warrant of arrest issued out of the police court of said city. The warrant recites a complaint under oath made against the petitioner, charging him with carrying on the business of selling goods, wares, and merchandise at a fixed place of business, in the city of Oakland, without first taking out a license to do so, in violation of an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte MoynierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex Parte HurlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Ex parte WoltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Inre Yick WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Ex Parte LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- County of Monterey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- County of San Luis Obispo v. GreenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898