Ex Parte Hurl
California Supreme Court
Application to the Chief Justice to be discharged from custody on habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court. Wallace, C. J.:
On habeas corpus. The return to the writ is that the prisoner is detained in the custody of the Captain of Police of the city of Oakland, pursuant to a commitment issued from the Police Court of that city, which is set forth. The commitment recites that the prisoner has been convicted in that Court of the crime of violating an ordinance of the city of Oakland, entitled “ an Ordinance establishing and regulating municipal licenses by unlawfully and maliciously engaging in and *558transacting the business of selling and disposing of distilled and fermented liquors in…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- In re GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Toi v. FrenchMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.