Legal Opinion
Sevigny v. City of Biddeford
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 4, 1975PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
The plaintiff, Richard R. Sevigny, utilized provisions of Rule 80B, M.R.Civ.P. to review in Superior Court (York County) the validity of the action of the City of Biddeford (City) acting through its Mayor and Council in removing the plaintiff from the office of Assessor. The defendants counterclaimed, charging the plaintiff with misconduct in office and illegal collection of salary.
Acting under an order of reference, M.R. Civ.P. 53(b)(1) a hearing was had before a referee who died prior to filing his re port. The parties subsequently agreed to submit all of the evidence…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Andrews v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Emilien Levesque v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- State v. DyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- In Re Kristy Y.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Camden National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.