Legal Opinion

Camden National Bank v. Peterson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 20, 2008No. Docket: Lin-07-516PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] William M. Peterson appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Wiseasset, Tucker, J.) in the foreclosure proceeding brought against him by Union Trust Company, the predecessor in interest to Camden National Bank. Peterson argues that (1) because the court (Mullen, J.) erred in granting the bank’s motion to enlarge time to respond to Peterson’s cross-motion for summary judgment, the bank’s late filed opposition to summary judgment should have been disregarded, and (2) the court (Tuck er; J.) erred in determining that there was no genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Keybank National Ass'n v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Sevigny v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. Griswold v. Town of DenmarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Quirion v. GerouxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bank of American, N.A. v. Scott A. GreenleafSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. Chase Home Finance LLC v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. GabaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API