Legal Opinion
U. S. Truck Co. v. Pennsylvania Surety Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 36,391PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
January 14, 1931, plaintiff commenced suit against defendant, a Pennsylvania insurance company, and also brought garnishment proceedings. Garnishment summonses were served the same day. Service in the principal suit was made on January 17th on the commissioner of insurance of this State, under 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12315, which, provides that the company—
“Shall likewise file with the commissioner of insurance its irrevocable written stipulation, duly authenticated by the company, stipulating and agreeing that any legal process affecting such company, served on the insurance commissioner or his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Martyne v. . American Union Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- City of South Bend v. Century Indemnity Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Bank v. Miller (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.