Legal Opinion

Filter v. McCabe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 In the matter now before this Court, we are asked to determine whether the Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 323 and 324, collectively referred to as the “Good Samaritan” doctrine, should apply to homeowners. We find that, under the specific facts of the within case, said sections do apply to a homeowner and, as such, reverse the order of the trial court.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows: On December 29, 1995, Appellee hosted a party at his home in Doylestown, Berks County, and among the attendees was Appellant Edward F. Filter, a neighbor of Appellee.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Ferry v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. J.E.J. v. Tri-County Big Bros./Big Sisters, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Efford v. Jockey ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Feeney v. Disston Manor Personal Care Home, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Petrongola v. Comcast-Spectacor, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Hill, J. v. Slippery Rock UniversitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API