People v. Schlott
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The defendant was charged under section 270 of the Penal Code with willfully omitting, without lawful excuse,' to furnish his minor child with necessary food, clothing, shelter, and medical attendance, he having the ability so to do. Upon his trial he was found guilty, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and a sentence of fine and imprisonment imposed. This judgment and order were affirmed by the district court of appeal (11 Cal. App. Dec. 594). One of the grounds upon which a reversal of the judgment had been claimed was the fact that the custody of the child had been 'awarded to its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Selfridge v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Matter of McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.