Legal Opinion

Crook v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2005No. 09A02-0405-CR-421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Samuel Crook (Crook), appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana, a Class A misdemeanor, Ind.Code § 35-48-4-11.

We reverse.

ISSUE

Crook raises two issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive and restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in denying his Motion to Suppress Evidence because the warrantless trash search was not based on reasonable suspicion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Based on an anonymous telephone call concerning illegal drug activity, Indiana State Trooper Robert Burgess (Trooper Burgess) was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beverly v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. D.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. LitchfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Love v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. HarmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Belvedere v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API